Imaging technology is the application of materials and methods to create, preserve, or duplicate images.It has applications in electroncis, medical and industrial manchinary, etc.Medical imaging is the technique and process of creating visual representations of the interior of a body for clinical analysis and medical intervention, as well as visual representation of the function of some organs or tissues.
Precision farming is a management concept that is peddled to be the next big thing in the global agriculture sector, promising to influence the industry on the similar lines of green or organic farming. Monitoring the growth of crops happens to be a crucial aspect of precision agriculture, thereby emphasizing the necessitation of incorporating effective imaging technology. Observance and measurement of intra-field activities imposes the use of devices that are designed and developed with advanced imaging technologies. Off lately, tests of using an unmanned aircraft system (UAS) such as drones for capturing the cultivation of crops indicate that precision farming will be deeply integrated with imaging technology.
Market Analysis and Insights: Global Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market
The global Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture market size is projected to reach US$ 504.1 million by 2027, from US$ 359.8 million in 2019, at a CAGR of 4.9% during 2021-2027.
With industry-standard accuracy in analysis and high data integrity, the report makes a brilliant attempt to unveil key opportunities available in the global Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture market to help players in achieving a strong market position. Buyers of the report can access verified and reliable market forecasts, including those for the overall size of the global Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture market in terms of revenue.
On the whole, the report proves to be an effective tool that players can use to gain a competitive edge over their competitors and ensure lasting success in the global Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture market. All of the findings, data, and information provided in the report are validated and revalidated with the help of trustworthy sources. The analysts who have authored the report took a unique and industry-best research and analysis approach for an in-depth study of the global Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture market.
Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Breakdown Data by Type
Multispectral technology
Hyperspectral technology
Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Breakdown Data by Application
Commerical
Research
Based on regional and country-level analysis, the Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture market has been segmented as follows:
North America
United States
Canada
Europe
Germany
France
U.K.
Italy
Russia
Nordic
Rest of Europe
Asia-Pacific
China
Japan
South Korea
Southeast Asia
India
Australia
Rest of Asia-Pacific
Latin America
Mexico
Brazil
Middle East & Africa
Turkey
Saudi Arabia
UAE
Rest of Middle East & Africa
In the competitive analysis section of the report, leading as well as prominent players of the global Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture market are broadly studied on the basis of key factors. The report offers comprehensive analysis and accurate statistics on revenue by the player for the period 2016-2021. It also offers detailed analysis supported by reliable statistics on price and revenue (global level) by player for the period 2016-2021.
The following players are covered in this report:
Bayspec
Tetracam
Micasense
Ximea
Teledyne Dalsa
Resonon
Precision farming is a management concept that is peddled to be the next big thing in the global agriculture sector, promising to influence the industry on the similar lines of green or organic farming. Monitoring the growth of crops happens to be a crucial aspect of precision agriculture, thereby emphasizing the necessitation of incorporating effective imaging technology. Observance and measurement of intra-field activities imposes the use of devices that are designed and developed with advanced imaging technologies. Off lately, tests of using an unmanned aircraft system (UAS) such as drones for capturing the cultivation of crops indicate that precision farming will be deeply integrated with imaging technology.
Market Analysis and Insights: Global Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market
The global Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture market size is projected to reach US$ 504.1 million by 2027, from US$ 359.8 million in 2019, at a CAGR of 4.9% during 2021-2027.
With industry-standard accuracy in analysis and high data integrity, the report makes a brilliant attempt to unveil key opportunities available in the global Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture market to help players in achieving a strong market position. Buyers of the report can access verified and reliable market forecasts, including those for the overall size of the global Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture market in terms of revenue.
On the whole, the report proves to be an effective tool that players can use to gain a competitive edge over their competitors and ensure lasting success in the global Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture market. All of the findings, data, and information provided in the report are validated and revalidated with the help of trustworthy sources. The analysts who have authored the report took a unique and industry-best research and analysis approach for an in-depth study of the global Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture market.
Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Breakdown Data by Type
Multispectral technology
Hyperspectral technology
Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Breakdown Data by Application
Commerical
Research
Based on regional and country-level analysis, the Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture market has been segmented as follows:
North America
United States
Canada
Europe
Germany
France
U.K.
Italy
Russia
Nordic
Rest of Europe
Asia-Pacific
China
Japan
South Korea
Southeast Asia
India
Australia
Rest of Asia-Pacific
Latin America
Mexico
Brazil
Middle East & Africa
Turkey
Saudi Arabia
UAE
Rest of Middle East & Africa
In the competitive analysis section of the report, leading as well as prominent players of the global Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture market are broadly studied on the basis of key factors. The report offers comprehensive analysis and accurate statistics on revenue by the player for the period 2016-2021. It also offers detailed analysis supported by reliable statistics on price and revenue (global level) by player for the period 2016-2021.
The following players are covered in this report:
Bayspec
Tetracam
Micasense
Ximea
Teledyne Dalsa
Resonon
1 Report Overview
1.1 Study Scope
1.2 Market Analysis by Type
1.2.1 Global Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Size Growth Rate by Type (2021-2027)
1.2.2 Multispectral technology
1.2.3 Hyperspectral technology
1.3 Market by Application
1.3.1 Global Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Share by Application (2021-2027)
1.3.2 Commerical
1.3.3 Research
1.4 Study Objectives
1.5 Years Considered
2 Executive Summary
2.1 Global Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Size
2.2 Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Size by Regions
2.2.1 Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Growth Rate by Regions (2021-2027)
2.2.2 Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Share by Regions (2021-2027)
2.3 Industry Trends
2.3.1 Market Top Trends
2.3.2 Market Use Cases
3 Key Players
3.1 Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Revenue by Players (2020-2021)
3.2 Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Key Players Headquaters and Area Served
3.3 Key Players Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Product/Solution/Service
3.4 Date of Enter into Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market
3.5 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion Plans
4 Breakdown by Type and by Application
4.1 Global Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Size by Type (2021-2027)
4.2 Global Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Size by Application (2021-2027)
5 North America
5.1 North America Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Forecast (2021-2027)
5.2 Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Key Players in North America
5.3 North America Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Size by Type
5.4 North America Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Size by Application
6.4.4 Canada
6 Europe
6.1 Europe Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Forecast (2021-2027)
6.2 Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Key Players in Europe
6.3 Europe Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Size by Type
6.4 Europe Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Size by Application
7 Japan
7.1 Japan Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Forecast (2021-2027)
7.2 Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Key Players in Europe
7.3 Japan Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Size by Type
7.4 Japan Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Size by Application
8 Rest of World
8.1 China
8.1.1 China Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Analysis
8.1.2 Key Players in China
8.2 Southeast Asia
8.2.1 Southeast Asia Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Analysis
8.2.2 Key Players in Southeast Asia
8.3 India
8.3.1 India Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Analysis
8.3.2 Key Players in India
9 International Player Profiles
9.1 Bayspec
9.1.1 Bayspec Company Details
9.1.2 Bayspec Description and Business Overview
9.1.3 Bayspec Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Introduction
9.1.4 Bayspec Revenue in Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Business (2020-2021)
9.1.5 Bayspec Recent Development
9.2 Tetracam
9.2.1 Tetracam Company Details
9.2.2 Tetracam Description and Business Overview
9.2.3 Tetracam Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Introduction
9.2.4 Tetracam Revenue in Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Business (2020-2021)
9.2.5 Tetracam Recent Development
9.3 Micasense
9.3.1 Micasense Company Details
9.3.2 Micasense Description and Business Overview
9.3.3 Micasense Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Introduction
9.3.4 Micasense Revenue in Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Business (2020-2021)
9.3.5 Micasense Recent Development
9.4 Ximea
9.4.1 Ximea Company Details
9.4.2 Ximea Description and Business Overview
9.4.3 Ximea Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Introduction
9.4.4 Ximea Revenue in Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Business (2020-2021)
9.4.5 Ximea Recent Development
9.5 Teledyne Dalsa
9.5.1 Teledyne Dalsa Company Details
9.5.2 Teledyne Dalsa Description and Business Overview
9.5.3 Teledyne Dalsa Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Introduction
9.5.4 Teledyne Dalsa Revenue in Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Business (2020-2021)
9.5.5 Teledyne Dalsa Recent Development
9.6 Resonon
9.6.1 Resonon Company Details
9.6.2 Resonon Description and Business Overview
9.6.3 Resonon Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Introduction
9.6.4 Resonon Revenue in Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Business (2020-2021)
9.6.5 Resonon Recent Development
10 Market Dynamics
10.1 Industry Trends
10.2 Market Drives
10.3 Market Challenges
10.4 Market Restraints
11 Key Findings in This Report
12 Appendix
12.1 Research Methodology
12.1.1 Methodology/Research Approach
12.1.2 Data Source
12.2 Disclaimer
12.3 Author Details
1.1 Study Scope
1.2 Market Analysis by Type
1.2.1 Global Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Size Growth Rate by Type (2021-2027)
1.2.2 Multispectral technology
1.2.3 Hyperspectral technology
1.3 Market by Application
1.3.1 Global Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Share by Application (2021-2027)
1.3.2 Commerical
1.3.3 Research
1.4 Study Objectives
1.5 Years Considered
2 Executive Summary
2.1 Global Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Size
2.2 Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Size by Regions
2.2.1 Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Growth Rate by Regions (2021-2027)
2.2.2 Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Share by Regions (2021-2027)
2.3 Industry Trends
2.3.1 Market Top Trends
2.3.2 Market Use Cases
3 Key Players
3.1 Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Revenue by Players (2020-2021)
3.2 Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Key Players Headquaters and Area Served
3.3 Key Players Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Product/Solution/Service
3.4 Date of Enter into Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market
3.5 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion Plans
4 Breakdown by Type and by Application
4.1 Global Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Size by Type (2021-2027)
4.2 Global Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Size by Application (2021-2027)
5 North America
5.1 North America Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Forecast (2021-2027)
5.2 Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Key Players in North America
5.3 North America Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Size by Type
5.4 North America Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Size by Application
6.4.4 Canada
6 Europe
6.1 Europe Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Forecast (2021-2027)
6.2 Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Key Players in Europe
6.3 Europe Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Size by Type
6.4 Europe Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Size by Application
7 Japan
7.1 Japan Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Forecast (2021-2027)
7.2 Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Key Players in Europe
7.3 Japan Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Size by Type
7.4 Japan Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Size by Application
8 Rest of World
8.1 China
8.1.1 China Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Analysis
8.1.2 Key Players in China
8.2 Southeast Asia
8.2.1 Southeast Asia Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Analysis
8.2.2 Key Players in Southeast Asia
8.3 India
8.3.1 India Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Analysis
8.3.2 Key Players in India
9 International Player Profiles
9.1 Bayspec
9.1.1 Bayspec Company Details
9.1.2 Bayspec Description and Business Overview
9.1.3 Bayspec Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Introduction
9.1.4 Bayspec Revenue in Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Business (2020-2021)
9.1.5 Bayspec Recent Development
9.2 Tetracam
9.2.1 Tetracam Company Details
9.2.2 Tetracam Description and Business Overview
9.2.3 Tetracam Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Introduction
9.2.4 Tetracam Revenue in Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Business (2020-2021)
9.2.5 Tetracam Recent Development
9.3 Micasense
9.3.1 Micasense Company Details
9.3.2 Micasense Description and Business Overview
9.3.3 Micasense Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Introduction
9.3.4 Micasense Revenue in Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Business (2020-2021)
9.3.5 Micasense Recent Development
9.4 Ximea
9.4.1 Ximea Company Details
9.4.2 Ximea Description and Business Overview
9.4.3 Ximea Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Introduction
9.4.4 Ximea Revenue in Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Business (2020-2021)
9.4.5 Ximea Recent Development
9.5 Teledyne Dalsa
9.5.1 Teledyne Dalsa Company Details
9.5.2 Teledyne Dalsa Description and Business Overview
9.5.3 Teledyne Dalsa Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Introduction
9.5.4 Teledyne Dalsa Revenue in Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Business (2020-2021)
9.5.5 Teledyne Dalsa Recent Development
9.6 Resonon
9.6.1 Resonon Company Details
9.6.2 Resonon Description and Business Overview
9.6.3 Resonon Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Introduction
9.6.4 Resonon Revenue in Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Business (2020-2021)
9.6.5 Resonon Recent Development
10 Market Dynamics
10.1 Industry Trends
10.2 Market Drives
10.3 Market Challenges
10.4 Market Restraints
11 Key Findings in This Report
12 Appendix
12.1 Research Methodology
12.1.1 Methodology/Research Approach
12.1.2 Data Source
12.2 Disclaimer
12.3 Author Details
